Marshall7a
15th February 2005 12:38 UTC
SectionDivider
I really really want SectionDivider back. My program users get terribly confused without it. Is there any way to get it back?
I'd try copying the source code for SectionDivider from 1.98 over to 2.05 but I have no compiler and don't really know what I'm doing.
Can anyone help me?
Many thanks for your valuable time :)
Joel
15th February 2005 14:17 UTC
I think that's old version..... sorry.... :(
kichik
15th February 2005 18:50 UTC
The code from 1.98 is incompatible because the components page now uses a tree instead of the list.
You can organize your sections into section groups to make it clearer.
Marshall7a
15th February 2005 19:06 UTC
That's a real shame. I use the section groups already which are very useful, but it would be nice to be able to distinguish between different types of section groups.
For example:
|-Program A
| |---component 1
| |---component 2
| |---component 3
|
|-Program B
. |---c1
. |---c2
—————————————————————
|-Desktop Shortcuts
| |--shortcut a
| |--shortcut b
|
|+Start Menu Shortcuts
|+Quick Launch shortcuts
—————————————————————
Source Code A
Source Code B
But if it can't be done, then it can't be done.
I will just have to find a way of 'faking' a divider. Any suggestions? NSIS doesn't seem to like many characters. The only lines it can display seem to be hyphen and underscore.
kichik
15th February 2005 19:23 UTC
It's not impossible. It's just not implemented because the section groups replace it.
Marshall7a
15th February 2005 19:25 UTC
Is there any way it can be added without causing trouble for the dev team?
kichik
15th February 2005 19:33 UTC
I don't understand your question. Why would it cause us trouble if someone else is adding it for himself or even to publish?
Marshall7a
15th February 2005 19:43 UTC
I was thinking more in terms of requesting the dev team to reimplement it, given that my own knowledge is insufficient.
kichik
15th February 2005 19:48 UTC
There's already an open feature request in the SourceForge project page. It's priority is not high.