BZ2 Disadvantage??
Is there a disadvantage to compiling your installer with BZ2? If not, why shouldn't NSIS do that automatically? Thanks much!!
10 posts
NSIS supports different compression methods zlib and bzip2. zlib is fast and is very efficient in resources consumption. bzip2 usually gives better results for large installers, but requires a bit more memory and is a little slower.From my own (non-comprehensive) experiences, it depends on your target machines and the archive you're creating. For example, I hit problems where I was extracing a ~40 Mb file using bzip2 on a Pentium 266 with 64Mb. This file took a significant amount of time to extract and somehow threw the timing of the setup script. Recompiling with zlib improved speed, and more importantly, didn't break the script. The same machine, however, is quite happy with ~20Mb files using bzip2.